Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 530 and NVIDIA GeForce 940MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, video outputs & ports, Compatibility, dimensions & requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - oto Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - clip Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Bạn đang xem: Amd radeon 530 vs nvidia geforce 940mx
AMD Radeon 530
vs
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
Xem thêm: “Sóng Tình Haeundae” Đến Việt Nam, Nhóm Trưởng T
Differences
Reasons lớn consider the AMD Radeon 530
Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) laterAround 7% higher bộ vi xử lý core clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 954 MHzAround 3% higher boost clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 993 MHz1031.5x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 23.83 GTexel / sAround 5% better floating-point performance: 800 GFLOPs vs 762.6 gflopsAround 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 182 vs 172| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 28 June 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 954 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 993 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 23.83 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 800 GFLOPs vs 762.6 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 182 vs 172 |
Reasons khổng lồ consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
2.2x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 50 WattAround 11% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4500 MHzAround 57% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1508 vs 962Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6420 vs 5597Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2486 vs 2021Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3587 vs 2246Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - oto Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2486 vs 2021Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3587 vs 2246Around 19% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 604 vs 506| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design power nguồn (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 4500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1508 vs 962 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6420 vs 5597 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2486 vs 2021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3587 vs 2246 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2486 vs 2021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3587 vs 2246 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 604 vs 506 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 530 GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
